Science & Urgent Problems of Society workgroup contact:

Dr. Alik Ismail-Zadeh

Email: Alik.Ismail-Zadeh@gpi.
uni-karlsruhe.de

 

Contact

Seltz Raymond, Deputy Secretary General

1 quai Lezay-Marnésia
67000 Strasbourg
Tel : +33 (0) 388 24 11 50
Fax : +33 (0) 388 24 75 56
Email : Please use our contact form

 
 
 

Science & Urgent Problems of Society

 

Presentation

see poster (pdf - 153.4KB)

 
To highlight an importance of basic research and new technology, we have to cope with certain urgent problems. It is obvious that research is a crucial important for progress and development. This is well-expressed for a development during next 30-50 years. But society and our governments are also concerned with many dangerous in time scale of a few years. For example, ecological catastrophe, such as a massive release of radioactivity from the enormous nuclear wastes in our countries; pandemics, such as a new AIDS-type virus; natural disasters, such as a major earthquake in the middles of one of our major cities; breakdown of law and order or outbursts of mass violence in a city; economic collapse in a region and many others.

In addition to these acute short-term threats, our countries also face significant chronic long-term challenges in other areas, including the conversion of industry from military to civilian production (that is very important after perestroyka) or environmental cleanup from the effects of nuclear weapons production.

When considering these various challenges, "we face a situation somewhat comparable to one of war, like the one we each faces on the eye of the 1941 surprise attacks on each of our countries, but a war in which we have not recognized that a world war has already started and could hit us any moment" (V. Keilis-Borok).

Several European and international bodies study this kind of problems, and some of them fund such programs. However, they do it oddly. We can collaborate them and work out general principles and strategy for solving of these urgent problems for the nearest future.
 
 

Reports

 
  • ACTIVITY REPORT 2010

The Work Group (WG) organized a ESOF2010 symposium on “Disaster Prediction and Management”. Scientific research in extreme natural hazards and understanding the conditions when hazard becomes a disaster is quite important not only from scientific point of view, but also to prevent society against catastrophic disasters like happened in Haiti this year (earthquake), in China in 2008 (earthquake and landslides), in USA in 2005 (Katrina hurricane) or in Europe in 2010 (the Icelandic volcano) or in 2002 (flooding). This symposium was a part of the activities in the framework of the project of the International Council for Science (ICSU) “Extreme Natural Hazards and Societal Implications” (http://www.enhans.org).


Problems of risk due to natural hazards and risk perception are also a great importance for society. At the symposium three distinguished European scientists presented state-of-the-art knowledge on natural hazards, modelling and prediction, and disaster management. Prof. V. Kossobolkov (Russian mathematician inventor a quantitative method for prediction of natural hazards) spoke on statistics of extreme events and their predictability. Prof. G. Panza (Italian seismologist) presented a new approach to natural hazard assessment which combines scenario-based and probabilistic methods. Prof. J. Zlotnicki (French volcanologist) in his talk on volcano dynamics and extreme eruptions mentioned how the disaster management is developed in many regions of the world, particularly in Europe and Asia. Prof. A. Ismail-Zadeh (German geophysicist) presented an overview of the scientific problems related to natural hazards and risks and moderate a discussion. The topic of natural hazards and disasters are multi-disciplinary (natural sciences, engineering and social science), and Euroscience is the best platform for discussion of such problems in Europe.

 
 
  • ACTIVITY REPORT 2008

The International Symposium “The Planet Earth” organized by the Euroscience WG “Science and Urgent Problem of Society” and GeoRisk Commission of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG, http://www.iugg.org) was held on 22 July in Barcelona, Spain on the occasion of the Euroscience Open Forum (ESOF), which provided both the European and the international science and business communities with an open platform for debate and communication. It was an opportunity to discuss and influence the future of research and innovation in Europe and elsewhere by involving all main stakeholders: scientists, business executives and policy-makers.

To read the full report, please download the PDF

- Activity Report - (46.02 Kb)

 

Symposium " Riding the storm: Can science keep us in the saddle? ", 16 July 2006, Euroscience Open Forum, Munich, Germany

 
The third joint symposium of Euroscience Working Group “Science and Urgent Problems of Society”and the GeoRisk Commission of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics on topic of urgent problems of society was held in Munich, Germany, during the Euroscience Open Forum from 15 July to 19 July 2006 (the first and second meetings took place in Budapest, Hungary, 2002, and in Stockholm, Sweden, 2004).
 

Meeting Report

 
Dr. A. Ismail-Zadeh (Chair of the Euroscience WG “Science and Urgent Problems of Society” and President of the IUGG GeoRisk Commission) opened the symposium and spoke on recent extreme natural events, which resulted in great humanitarian tragedies because of weak preventive disaster management. He considered several factors (natural, economical, political, awareness and preparedness) brought about the humanitarian tragedies of the early XXI century.

Dr. F. Wenzel (Director of the Geophysical Institute and Professor in Geophysics, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany) presented the talk on extreme events that disrupts civil life, social systems, regional stability, etc. Recent events that have been counted into this category are the 26. December 2004 tsunami in SE-Asia, the August 2005 hurricane Katrina in the Gulf of Mexico, but also the August 2002 1000 year floods in Germany, Austria and Czech Republic. Their occurrence raise fundamental questions such as: To what degree can we 'understand' them? Are these events predictable? What have phenomenological different events in common? Is our vulnerability to Extreme Events growing? What controls the vulnerability? Can Extreme Events be tamed or managed? Can we protect ourselves? To what extent, what is the prize? In terms of natural disasters extreme events are understood as extreme risks for society, which grows – independent of the extreme natural event – by increasing exposure of people and values and increasing vulnerability of society. It is difficult to prepare societies for extremely rare events. However, Wenzel considers that scientists need to improve earth system monitoring and the capacity for early warning. On this basis more realistic statements on forthcoming extreme events and their impact are conceivable and can be used as input for public safety policy.

Dr. H. Moderassi (Chair, IGOS-Geohazards Initiative) spoke on the need for information on the current state of the Earth System. The effects of a growing population and an increasing economic development has led to public and political awareness of the human and economic significance of the changes in the environment. The international scientific community is now collaborating at a global scale to better understand and monitor the current state of the Earth and its environment and to predict its evolution. An effective monitoring of our planet on a global scale requires a multi-disciplinary and multi-national co-operation.

Dr. V. Kossobokov (Research Professor, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia) spoke on quantitative earthquake predictions. He mentioned that earthquake prediction is widely recognized as one of the global challenging problems facing the mankind in the 21st century. The recent scientific advances in understanding the hierarchical nature of the lithosphere and its dynamics did result the design of reproducible earthquake prediction technique. The real-time experimental testing aimed at prediction of the largest earthquakes worldwide from 1992 to the present proved statistically a possibility of practical earthquake forecasting although of an accuracy of 1-5 years and 5-10 times the anticipated source dimension. He discussed how to use earthquake prediction of limited accuracy to the benefit of population living in seismic regions, as well as feasible perspectives of developing a new generation of earthquake prediction technique of higher accuracy.

Dr. A. Smolka (Chair of the GeoRisk Department, Munich Reinsurance, Germany) spoke on risk management from an insurance perspective. The growing loss burden from natural disasters requires a cooperative effort from all parties involved in order to mitigate and reduce the losses from future events. An approach to managing the risk emanating from natural disasters is introduced. Under the heading of “risk partnership”, the roles played by the persons and entities affected, the financial sector and the state, are described from an international perspective based on actual business practice. The potential role of the insurance sector in risk mitigation is addressed specifically, and some examples of private/public partnerships are presented. The specific challenge posed by extreme natural events is discussed from an insurance perspective, and along the lines of the approach to more common hazards.

Dr. J. Paterson (Professor of Law, University of Aberdeen, UK) discussed the relation between disaster risk management and governance. As the UNDP notes in its 2004 report, Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development, ‘today we live with the accumulated risk of past development pathways’. In other words, all else equal, the magnitude of an earthquake or of a hurricane is a given, but the impact of such an event varies according to decisions taken regarding settlement location, land use planning, building design, and so on. It is not surprising, then, that the same organization in drawing conclusions from its survey of disaster and development and in making recommendations states that ‘Most fundamental is the role of governance at all scales from the local to the global’. Where political power lies and how it is exercised can accordingly make a significant difference to the impact of a natural disaster. Science is a key component in the human response to natural hazards, but it can only fulfill its potential in this regard if it is married to appropriate governance structures. He examined some of the principal themes in the sometimes fraught relationship between science and politics and considers whether there are legal instruments that could assist in cementing and guiding that relationship in the field of disaster risk management.

The symposium was followed by a press-briefing where more than 30 representatives of European media agencies were present.

  • The article "A Focus on Risk Science and Sustainable Development" by A. Ismail-Zadeh and T. Beer was published on 2 November 2004 in the weekly newspaper of the American Geophysical Union and reports on the workshop “Risk Science, Society and Sustainable Development”.
    Read the "A Focus on Risk Science and Sustainable Development" article here (pdf - 55.5KB)

  • The WorkGroup together with the Commission on Geophysical Risk and Sustainability of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) organized the workshop “Risk Science, Society and Sustainable Development” which was held on 26-27 August 2004 in Stockholm during the 2004 EuroScience Open Forum. The workshop was sponsored by the NATO Science Program, IUGG, and EuroScience. More than 30 participants from 17 countries took part in the workshop. Talks and discussions addressed mainly the question of how science can help in reduction of risks and in sustainable development of our society
    See the Stockholm Workshop PROGRAM (pdf - 107.0KB)

  • The workshop provided an invaluable insight into the relationship between risk science, society and sustainable development in a world that becomes more turbulent since beginning of the century. The participants at the Workshop were conscious of the need to define a way forward in order to reinforce the social and vital link between the scientific community and the public so as to provide a general guide for scientists to deal with risk and sustainability
    See the Stockholm Workshop REPORT (pdf - 2.1MB)

  • General Report on the Workshop "Science for Reduction of Risk and Sustainable Development of Society"(pdf - 264.3KB), Budapest, 15-16 June 2002.
    A book containing peer-reviewed papers and case studies derived from the Workshop presentations has been published:
    More info and table of contents (pdf - 23.9KB)

 
 
Copyright 2007 Euroscience.org
Site by